Differences between revisions 1 and 5 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2010-12-01 23:46:24
Size: 164
Editor: shoobe01
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2010-12-13 17:21:57
Size: 2411
Editor: shoobe01
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 1: Line 1:
Conventional display "page of page" (7 of 23), range of total. This one is the interactive version. You can click prev/next, to a range, to a page, etc. All options covered... ALSO try to integrate gesture (or key) flip as for eReader style. Fake page flips, as indicator there are more pages (show accurate stack of pages, so it works like a scrollbar for position sense) and to indicate you moved to a new page.
Line 2: Line 4:
Location within a series of pages should be clearly communicated, and access provided to other pages in the stack.
Line 5: Line 8:
The many screens displayed serially for large amounts of content may be considered pages, as though they are part of a bound paper item.

Page numbers, and a sense of the relative position within the total, are displayed.

Tied to this display is a method to move between pages easily and quickly. Methods to jump further than the previous and next page are also usually offered.
Line 8: Line 16:
Two basic variations exist:

'''Widget-based''' - Boring (p of p, jumpers)

'''Organic''' - Natural displays are becoming more common now, especially on simulating machine-era presentation methods to imply
Line 11: Line 24:
Pagination controls should be presented organically, with all controls visible or immediately accessible, whenever possible. When needed, a larger control panel style of interface may be offered instead. It may be accessed by selecting the pagination display elements.

basic forward back button

fwd/back gestures

jump a few fwd/back; as google when individual pages listed, will run out of room

jump to first/last

Jump to arbitrary page, usually by typing number.

Some of the jump methods may also be possible with gestures, and actions such as press-and-hold on the page flip section. However, these are not yet consistent and well-defined, so cannot yet be considered patterns.
Line 14: Line 40:
clicky ones...

Gestural ones.... and especially the implication of page thickness...
Line 17: Line 46:
Pagination controls can easily get out of hand. In any reasonably complex system, it is easy to find justification for every method of page control. Avoid this, and attempt to only include the minimum set needed, so they can be placed on the page and be easy to find and use.

WARNING ABOUT REALISTIC REPRESENTATIONS...

Conventional display "page of page" (7 of 23), range of total. This one is the interactive version. You can click prev/next, to a range, to a page, etc. All options covered... ALSO try to integrate gesture (or key) flip as for eReader style. Fake page flips, as indicator there are more pages (show accurate stack of pages, so it works like a scrollbar for position sense) and to indicate you moved to a new page.

Problem

Location within a series of pages should be clearly communicated, and access provided to other pages in the stack.

Solution

The many screens displayed serially for large amounts of content may be considered pages, as though they are part of a bound paper item.

Page numbers, and a sense of the relative position within the total, are displayed.

Tied to this display is a method to move between pages easily and quickly. Methods to jump further than the previous and next page are also usually offered.

Variations

Two basic variations exist:

Widget-based - Boring (p of p, jumpers)

Organic - Natural displays are becoming more common now, especially on simulating machine-era presentation methods to imply

Interaction Details

Pagination controls should be presented organically, with all controls visible or immediately accessible, whenever possible. When needed, a larger control panel style of interface may be offered instead. It may be accessed by selecting the pagination display elements.

basic forward back button

fwd/back gestures

jump a few fwd/back; as google when individual pages listed, will run out of room

jump to first/last

Jump to arbitrary page, usually by typing number.

Some of the jump methods may also be possible with gestures, and actions such as press-and-hold on the page flip section. However, these are not yet consistent and well-defined, so cannot yet be considered patterns.

Presentation Details

clicky ones...

Gestural ones.... and especially the implication of page thickness...

Antipatterns

Pagination controls can easily get out of hand. In any reasonably complex system, it is easy to find justification for every method of page control. Avoid this, and attempt to only include the minimum set needed, so they can be placed on the page and be easy to find and use.

WARNING ABOUT REALISTIC REPRESENTATIONS...

Examples

Pagination (last edited 2011-07-31 20:49:42 by shoobe01)