|
Size: 541
Comment:
|
Size: 1965
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| * | * [[https://m.signalvnoise.com/the-art-of-designing-with-heart-f5dc4df21697?gi=b2cbb05f4947#---0-183.bd3fcdl2y]] Read it. Maybe. * [[https://twitter.com/stephanierieger/status/776114105656545280]] on misapplying research. People treating computers like people doesn't mean you need to anthropomorphize them. * [[http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/9/soldiers-say-intel-tool-is-too-difficult/]] crappy systems kill. There are tech issues (slow) but unfriendly and hard to figure out? That's UX. * [[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aygWy0dP3k&list=]] "My 20min talk-real-fast introduction to the Physical Web. I try to focus on WHAT you can build rather than the WHY" Scott Jenson * http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/RAB1603.pdf speaking of IoT, we're using web 1.0 practices and keep trying to kill people; how there's no checks, no guardrails. E.g. why not design this to avoid accelerating so fast it hurts people, ever, regardless of commands issued at the moment. This is totally UX, as the intersection of software and reality/people is what the issue is always, but pure s/w devs don't consider reality nearly enough. * On how R&D pays off http://www.wvgenweb.org/ohio/ww1-kindelberger.htm - I don't like failing fast to the public, and all this speedy lean, MVP stuff really. I say invest in R&D and fail /secretly/. Launch only great products. - Find quote about rabbits! |
Describe November 2016 here.
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/j/johnlasset490502.html IF I can find a full source for it
http://99percentinvisible.org/episode/on-average/ read all this. Suggested by lisa as relates to a11y. I think of the USAF/USN elimination of the non-norms. May fit as a reference on that page of that deck even.
https://m.signalvnoise.com/the-art-of-designing-with-heart-f5dc4df21697?gi=b2cbb05f4947#---0-183.bd3fcdl2y Read it. Maybe.
https://twitter.com/stephanierieger/status/776114105656545280 on misapplying research. People treating computers like people doesn't mean you need to anthropomorphize them.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/feb/9/soldiers-say-intel-tool-is-too-difficult/ crappy systems kill. There are tech issues (slow) but unfriendly and hard to figure out? That's UX.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aygWy0dP3k&list= "My 20min talk-real-fast introduction to the Physical Web. I try to focus on WHAT you can build rather than the WHY" Scott Jenson
http://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/RAB1603.pdf speaking of IoT, we're using web 1.0 practices and keep trying to kill people; how there's no checks, no guardrails. E.g. why not design this to avoid accelerating so fast it hurts people, ever, regardless of commands issued at the moment. This is totally UX, as the intersection of software and reality/people is what the issue is always, but pure s/w devs don't consider reality nearly enough.
On how R&D pays off http://www.wvgenweb.org/ohio/ww1-kindelberger.htm - I don't like failing fast to the public, and all this speedy lean, MVP stuff really. I say invest in R&D and fail /secretly/. Launch only great products. - Find quote about rabbits!
For a complete index of the monthly newsletters, see http://4ourth.com/wiki/Newsletter
To sign up for 4ourth Mobile Online Training, visit http://4ourth.com/Training/